Tradin' Paint writes:
"NASCAR Date Changes"
Posted by Joey2448 on July 9, 2010
Viewed 434 times
Why is NASCAR considering all these stupid date/track changes???
Kansas is lobbying for a second date, which most likely would take a race away from California. Look, if Fontana's going back to one-race-a-year, they ought to give the date back to Rockingham, not give another to Kansas. Nothing personal against Kansas, the racing there isn't bad...but why must we have another cookie-cutter date? Same goes for Las Vegas.
In a perfect world, the schedule would look like this:
Racetracks losing a date:
Racetracks gaining a date (or a second one)
The road course Circuit Gilles Villeneuve in Montreal ought to be in the Chase, giving the champion more credibility. It would replace Texas in November. Rockingham would replace California in the Chase, and Darlington would replace Loudon in the Chase, as well.
The Chase would look like this:
That way, there's a little of everything....high banked speedways, flat tracks, a short track, a plate track, cookie-cutters, and even a road course.
Check out more interesting stuff at my blog!
Opinions expressed in blogs are those of the individual bloggers and do not necessarily represent the views of racing-reference.info.